Food bank | https://www.flickr.com/photos/staffslive/

Institute for Global Prosperity publish first report on Universal Basic Services

“Our economy is failing to deliver for so many people. Our research, presented in this paper, demonstrates unequivocally that money spent on providing basic services required by every citizen in the 21st century, dramatically reduces the cost of basic living for those on the lowest incomes.”

Published: Monday 16 October, 2017



At a time of austerity, it is sometimes difficult to remember that the UK is one of the richest countries on the planet. Rising homelessness and the use of foodbanks are just a couple of indicators that a portion of our society is being left behind.

In a move to rethink the country’s economic strategy, the Institute for Global Prosperity has published a paper that recommends an overhaul to conventional government policies.

The proposal concerns an affordable alternative to a ‘citizens’ income’, something the Institute has called “Universal Basic Services”. Pilot schemes for a basic income are advocated in other parts of the world including Canada, Kenya and Finland, but authors of the report say this is a more radical and progressive approach.

Citing the UK’s record number of people in poverty, Professor Henrietta Moore, Director of the Institute at UCL, says: “our economy is failing to deliver for so many people. Our research, presented in this paper, demonstrates unequivocally that money spent on providing basic services required by every citizen in the 21st century, dramatically reduces the cost of basic living for those on the lowest incomes.”

Recommendations from the report include free public transport, basic access to broadband and mobile phones, meal provisions and an expansion to social housing. Reforms would cost £42bn, paid for by changes to the Personal Allowance. At just 2.3% of the UK’s GDP, this makes the proposal fiscally neutral.

By comparison, if citizens were paid a Universal Basic Income at the current level of jobseekers allowance – £73.10 per week – it would cost approximately £250bn per year. This is around 13% of total GDP, or 31% of all current UK expenditure.

Those on the lowest incomes would benefit most from the changes, saving around £126 per week in costs if they were to access all the services provided. This is the basis for the proposals, providing a “social wage” by removing the need to pay for Universal Basic Services, rather than government distributing cash payments.

On top of saving money, experts say that the proposals will create “a more cohesive society”, bridging the gap of inequality and helping workers facing job insecurity due to automation. The report also says that these changes will preserve the incentive to work. Authors say reforms to economic policy will help place more services in the same bracket as the NHS, free at the point of use.

Sam Baylis

You can read the original post here

Share this article:




Recent Posts

Time for a new prosperity, rooted in a symbiotic relationship with nature

Commentary

The independent review on The Economics of Biodiversity led by Professor Sir Partha Dasgupta has now been delivered to the government. The report underlines our failure to grasp that our economies are “embedded within Nature, and not external to it.” We rely on nature to “provide us with food, water and shelter; regulate our climate and disease; maintain nutrient cycles and oxygen production; and provide us with spiritual fulfilment and opportunities for recreation and recuperation which can enhance our health and well-being.”

Read More

Co-designing solutions to Lebanon’s energy crisis

Commentary

On 4 August 2020, a massive explosion at Beirut’s port killed at least 200 people and caused up to $15bn in damage to buildings and infrastructure – including the destruction of the public electricity company building. It was the latest blow for a country battling a 30-year energy crisis and facing chronic shortages as a result of an ageing infrastructure based around fossil fuels.

Read More

Reinvigorating local economies through Universal Basic Services, not income

Commentary

In 1945, the UK’s welfare state was set up to address the want, need and misery caused by unemployment. Seventy-five years later, prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, we had almost full employment in the UK – and yet we still have massive levels of poverty and precarity experienced by people in work.

Read More